Сравнение мультиплатформенных игр

[dimm]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyk-18WLyMY

• game moves to a physically based material system rather than just relying on diffuse textures
• shadow maps have a lot of aliasing and cascading
• shadow map resolution changes with camera angle when viewed up close
• unlike previous games, CoH3 doesn't push API
  • no RT shadows, which could have been very good here
• not a challenging the gpu like previous games, 200FPS @ 4K on a 4090
• the pre-rendered cutscenes are marred by macroblocking
• optimized settings (3600/2060S/90-120fps/1440p)
  • can be cpu limited on a 12900k at 4k on a 4090 (130-150fps)
  • single thread limited, but less so that other games
  • the benchmark shows the 3600/2060S getting over 60fps @ 1440p and max settings
  • game require full restarts when changing settings
  • anti aliasing - low
  • shadow quality - medium
  • image quality (affects model quality too) - high
  • physics quality - high
  • texture quality - high
  • geometry quality - high
  • res scale - 83%
• pretty much no shader compilation stutter past the first seconds of the tutorial
• safe game, technically

 

[dimm]

• UE4 over the original Dragon Engine
• the logic and animation is the same as the Dragon Engine version just in UE4 for rendering
• lighting greatly upgraded
• character models have been upgraded as well with new models and textures
• side characters has more modest upgrades
• cutscene models are much higher quality than gameplay models
• environmental assets geometry and textures are pretty much the same and are kinda boxy
• some lighting issues, mostly in interior spaces: characters don't get affected by lighting, and environments are flat
• gameplay animation is pretty stiff
• Ishin is a vote of confidence for moving to UE when comparing to Yakuza 7
• PS5/SX - 1440p, no dynamic res
• SS - 1080p
• no upsampling to 4K
• PS5 has a toned down AO and sharper shadows, possibly a filtering difference
• SX/PS5 has a very solid 60fps
  • cutscenes are 30fps with irregular frame pacing
  • camera cuts cause frame drops
  • intense battles can drop a couple of frames
• SS has dips in exploration and has some heavier drops
  • probably flying too close to premium systems
• PC has no noticeable compilation stutters as of patching
  • no clear pre-compilation
  • has frame rate issues as the consoles
  • 30fps cutscenes with stutter
  • XeSS and FSR2.1
  • FSR has some shimmering
  • visual options are very basic, nothing really over console

 

[dimm]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKU5yuXH-Tk

• two modes on current gen
  • frame rate and resolution
• extra options on current gen
  • motion blur, dof, ca
  • hair strands
  • ray tracing
• chromatic aberration toggle on last gen
• hair strand
  • geometry hair rather than textured cards
  • console versions doesn't seem to receive lighting, looks like a bug
  • in frame rate mode, the strand count is reduced but are thicker
• no subsurface scattering on skin
• ray traced reflection
  • RT reflections on PS5 is borked. works on series x and pc
  • reflective surfaces rarely show up anyway in the demo
• pc version has higher resolution textures than current gen
• screen space ambient occlusion
  • doesn't use the ray traced global illumination solution as previous games use
• ps4 suffers from light leaking
• ps4 also doesn't have dynamic shadows on leon
• ps4 has blockier volumetrics
• resolution mode
  • static 2160p, checkerboarded
  • series x has less breakup and looks sharper
  • chromatic aberration blurs the game on ps5 *snoop dogg gif*
  • rt and strands off is in the 50s, don't use if you don't have a vrr display
  • rt and strands on is in the 40s, swings wildly
• performance mode
  • 1440p, checkerboarded on ps5
  • 1728p, checkerboarded on series x
  • may or may not be dynamic
  • with rt and hair disabled, very stable 60fps
  • rt and strands enabled is in 50s, very good with VRR
    • better on series x with vrr due to how ps5 handles vrr
• base last gen
  • targets 60, ain't stable
    • ps4 is almost always under 60
  • no 30fps cap
  • 900p on ps4
  • distant enemies update at a lower rate
  • seems to be cpu limited
• recommedations
  • no vrr? perf with rt and strands off
  • yes vrr? perf with rt on and strands off
• xbox has borked controls, not very responsive
• pc
  • better hair strands that work
  • better textures
  • better SSAO through CACAO
  • chromatic aberration still causes issues
  • no compilation stutter, but loading spikes
    • stutter is worse the higher your frame rate is
  • good pc port so far
  • ultra-wide supported
    • cutscenes are pillarboxed
• the yellow paint discussion
  • original game had baked lighting, so breakable objects stood out via glowing
  • breakables are properly lit now, so they have to make some way for players to know they're interactable

 

[dimm]

Еще одно видео по RE4R:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1QOYoNjAO0

• since the demo, only the ray tracing issue has been solved on ps5
• resolution mode - 2160p
• frame rate mode - 1944p
• ps5 has worse IP, seemingly due to checkerboarding
• xbox's poor controls are still there, overly large dead zone and borked acceleration curve
• hair strand lighting is still broken
• PS5 has slightly higher frame rate, Series X has better IQ
• high quality character modeling as expected of modern capcom
• level design is more a hub-based and open game with no loading screens
• some ray traced reflections pop in and out due to how the bhv is updated
• the problems make it feel a bit less optimized that other RE ENgine games
• Oliver will do more in depth comparisons, and Alex will cover the PC version

 

[dimm]

RE4R после патча:

 

[dimm]

Dead Island 2:

Let's go through each of the consoles in turn, starting with the base Xbox One edition - the most constrained last-gen console. Xbox One runs at a native 1600x900 resolution with a 30fps target that's mostly stuck to - there are occasional hitches and single frame drops, triggered by UI changes or picking up a weapon, but it's a surprisingly smooth experience that shows evidence of plenty of optimisation and no signs of dynamic resolution scaling during our testing.

Switching over to base PS4, it's again positive, with a native 1080p presentation and the same core visual settings as the base Xbox One. However, the 30fps frame-rate target isn't held quite as well, with slightly more aggressive hitching in places - but most areas remain a watertight 30fps. Note that neither base PS4 or Xbox One are able to host online games at launch - PS4 Pro, Xbox One X or a current-gen console are required to host sessions, although Dambusters is aiming to address this restriction in the weeks following launch.
Next up are the enhanced machines: Xbox One X and PS4 Pro. Both consoles use the same visual settings as their older counterparts, with textures, shadows and alpha effects all matching, but push a crisper image with a native 2560x1440 presentation. Again, the frame-rate target is 30fps, with each machine sticking to it almost perfectly, with rare incidences of one frame dips but overall a robust experience all around.

For current-gen console owners there's even better news. PS5, Series X and Series S each get a push to 60fps, and in the case of PS5 and Series X there's a sizeable resolution boost as well. The PS5 version runs at a native 3072x1728 with a perfectly-held 60fps, while Series X targets the same resolution and also hits 60fps outside of a few brief drops while using elemental attacks. Jumping over to Series S, performance remains excellent with only occasional drops from the 60fps target, with heavier effects work causing frame-rates to drop into the high 50s in rare instances. However, resolution is lower than on the other current-gen machines, with a native 1920x1080 presentation - a fair trade for 60fps, I think it's fair to say.

 

[dimm]

Порт на PC не очень:

 

[dimm]

Redfall:

 

[dimm]

SF6:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXb6xzN4VzM

- Tested the demo on all available consoles (PS4/Pro/PS5/Series S|X)
- "Bar of quality is so much higher" - when compared to SF5 in main character model details and arcade fights
- World tour mode has various technical shortcomings, including 10 FPS animations on distant enemies, pop-up etc. This is the same on all consoles

- Starting with PS console trio comparison
- PS4: 1080p, Pro: 1440p, PS5: 4K in both Res and Perf mode
- PS5 has additional DoF and higher texture resolution in comparison to PS4/Pro
- Ambient shading, floor textures, density and reflections are lower quality (SSR is missing) on PS4 compared to PS5
- SSR is re-engaged in world tour mode but texture quality etc is worse than PS5. It can take seconds for full textures to load

- Series S: Only one performance profile which runs at 1080p.
- SX: 4K in both modes like PS5.
- Series S more closer to PS4 Pro in terms of some rendering settings. Ryu's beard is also bugged in Series S. Series X, same as PS5.

- On PS5 | SX we have 2 modes, Res and Perf.
- Res modes is pretty much locked to 60 in regular arcade mode
- Perf mode doesn't change much in the arcade mode.
- However in the World Tour mode, the Resolution mode drops to 30 FPS in battles w/ bad frame pacing. Performance mode keeps 60 FPS but drops resolution to 1440p.
- The above is the same on both PS5 and SX

- Series S runs at native 1080p in all modes at 60 FPS barring one tutorial fight where it has some drops to mid 50s.

- PS4 / Pro have no toggles and world tour mode runs with unlocked frame rate while battles cap to 30 FPS.
- Arcade mode runs at 60 FPS on both without breaking any sweat.

- All machines have a "Low latency" toggle which disables V-Sync
- On PS5|SX it also targets 120hz. However, the game logic is still locked to 60hz. So it's a 60hz image in a 120hz container.
- At best it might offer a little improvement in controller response but it does not make the game run at 120hz.

 

[dimm]

SF6:

• Xbox Series X and PS5 are identical on graphics. Arcade is 4K/60
• Quality is 4K/30 for World Tour. Performance mode does World Tour at 1440p/60. Does not affect Arcade mode.
• Series S cuts down textures, effects, and background objects vs Series X/PS5. Everything runs at 1080p/60 locked.
• PS4 has better textures than Series S, but World tour is locked at 30fps no matter what. Cuts down other effects.

Input Latency:

• Testing by Noodalls
• Recommend setup is IDR On with VRR/Freesync to remove screen tearing.
• Numbers below are IDR On and VRR. If you don't have IDR On, you can expect up to 90ms of input lag.

 

[dimm]

Бывший суперэкз PS5, невозможный ни чем другом, так как "супербыстрый ссд" )))

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I71u7j1Izww


Как оказалась игра вполне играбельна и на обычных HDD.

 

[-A-]

Бывший суперэкз PS5, невозможный ни чем другом, так как "супербыстрый ссд" )))

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I71u7j1Izww


Как оказалась игра вполне играбельна и на обычных HDD.

Я заценил, кстати, на самсе 980 про 512Гб фризов с рифтами и т.д. вообще не было. В целом, кстати, я так понял, что это продолжение Инто зе Нексус. И в принципе, играется весьма бодренько, гораздо лучше, чем "Ремейк" первой части по кинчику. Что еще прикольно - способности из Нексуса не надо заново открывать =))). Хотя глобально, игра в плане геймплея все равно кажется не такой бодрой как инто зе нексус. Местами очень сумбурный дизайн уровней у нее. Ну и в целом, технически графа хорошая, но в плане всего остального выглядит как прошлый век, немного апгрейженная графа с ПС4. Не знаю, буду проходить или нет =). Но вообще надо бы. На макс, сложности, кстати, как и Нексус, играется довольно легко, очень много простора для ошибок.

 

[dimm]

Red Dead Redemption on PS4 - DF Tech Review

и на сыче:

 

[Wendigo]

Red Dead Redemption

30 фпс в порте игры 2010 года

 

[dimm]

И DF признали - шедевр:

Новая компания от MG тянет на целую отдельную игру.

 

[dimm]

DF посвятила отдельный выпуск версии порта для свитча. Однозначно лучше (почти по всем параметрам) версий для XB360/PS3, очень близка к порту PS4.

Нативные 1080@30fps в доке и 720@30fps в портативе. Радуют что ARM прямо так хорошо осваивают разрабы.

 

[dimm]

BG3 PS5 vs PC:

 

[dimm]

Starfield PC Tech Review:

 

[dimm]

MK1:

Xbox Series S: Dynamic 1440p/60fps (Common 1152~1080p)
Xbox Series X: Dynamic 2160p/60fps (Common 1944~1872p)
PS5: Dynamic 2160p/60fps (Common 1800~1728p)

- The consoles have a single display mode in Mortal Kombat 1 at 60fps with dynamic resolution and FSR.
- PS5 has a slightly lower average resolution than Xbox Series X.
- Xbox Series S has some minor cutbacks in some settings such as terrain geometry, post processing effects, ncps density, textures or shadows.
- PC has slight visual advantages thanks to better shadows and post-processing effects.
- Framerate capped at 60fps on all platforms. Ingame cinematics, menus and special movements are framerate capped at 30fps.
- Good PC performance. Without problems to achieve the 60fps in ultra in any graphic of the range 30/40.
- High visual level and solidity on all platforms. No matter where you play it, all are a good choice.

Первые 90 минут:

Спойлер

View: https://youtu.be/xeeVnkVXgrY

 

[dimm]

Super Mario RPG - Switch VS SNES: