Сравнение мультиплатформенных игр

Так сразу бы и купил, понятно что щас уже под это поколение точить будут. Олдген уже не в приоритете.

 

Hunt: Showdown обновили (Update 1.7) для Xbox Series S/X/PS5 до 60fps, сравнение олдгена (не помню было-ли оно здесь):

 

MATRIX UE5 Demo:

 

Спойлер

• on paper the One X's gpu > Series S's gpu; more memory and higher bandwidth
• however Series S cpu > One X's cpu, so One X is limited to 30fps but at higher resolutions
• Guardians of the Galaxy
  • Series S - 1080p/30, better shadows and textures
  • One X - 1440p-1890p/30
• Forza Horizon 5
  • SS - 1440p/30 or 1080p/60 (both dynamic); 4x msaa; quality has higher object detail
  • OX - 2160p/30 (dynamic), 4x msaa; object detail similar to performance mode on SS
• Halo Infinite
  • SS - 1080p, 30 or 60; 30fps has framepacing issues
  • OX - 2160p/30 or 1440p/60; 30fps has framepacing issues, 60fps has framerate drops
• Far Cry 6
  • SS - 1224p/60fps, dynamic
  • OX -2160p30fps, dynamic
• CoD Vanguard
  • SS - 1440p/60 or 1080p/120, dynamic,
  • OX - 2160p/60, dynamic, lots of visual effects downgraded; cutscenes are 40-50
• CoD Warzone
  • SS - 1080p/60, actually Xbox One mode
  • OX - 2160p/60, dynamic, actually 45-55
• Cyberpunk
  • SS - 1080p-1440p/30, better pedestrian density
  • OX - 1440p/30, driving dials fps to low 20s
• Metro Exodus
  • SS - 1080p/60 (lower internal res), full ray traced GI
  • OX - 2160/30
• pretty even so far for Oliver
• loading (OX HDD, OX SSD, SS)
  • Vanguard: 24.4, 11.8, 3.5
  • FH5: 85.5, 42.9, 24.3
  • Halo: 61.3, 27.8, 14.1
  • the Ascent: 128.9, 30.8, 30.3
• Backwards Compatibility
  • Final Fantasy 13 -
    • SS - 1152p, 2x msaa
    • OX - 1728p, 2x msaa
  • Mirrors Edge
    • SS - 1440p/60, has drops
    • OX - 2160p/30
  • Series S has Auto HDR, better loading, and 60fps on some 360 games
  • some One series games don't have One X enhancements on Series
  • Doom 2016
    • SS - 1080p
    • OX - 2160p
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
    • SS - 864p
    • OX - 2160p
  • Far Cry 4
    • SS - 60
    • OX - high res, 30
  • Prey
    • SS - 60
    • OX - high res, 30
• One X is better with older games
• Series S has some fps boost for some games, faster load times, also has new hardware features
• One X is competitive in recent titles and very much in older titles, but will struggle more with 60fps
• One X will be unsupported eventually while Series S will be support alongside the Series X

 

Спойлер

• menus work good with m&k and controller
• DX11, no shader compilation waits, or compilation stutter as seen in DX12/Vulkan games
• no Field of View option, possibly due to a lot of off camera tricks
• nvidia reflex to reduce latency, avg 11ms less vs ps5
• PS5 controller mapping
• faster loading, ~4s faster over PS5
• possibly limited by ssd and framerate
• PS4P/PS5 (will call this PS5 from here on out) uses checkerboarding to achieve 4K
• constant camera sway and particles cause artifacts in checkerboarding
• high res and DLSS fixes this issue
• DLSS has better resolved than native at times
• DLSS Performance 4K (1080p internal) is better than PS5
• PS5 quality is called "Original"
• Shadows are the most obvious improvement, way less blobby at higher than original
• cascade range of shadows on ps5 is very short, on ultra, can cause a big difference in visuals in some scenes
• Geo Quality next most obvious improvement, less pop in
• high AO adds bounced lighting, similar to SSGI
• volume fog and screen space reflections is situational, increases resolution above original
  • PS5 looks softer than Original due to checkerboard rendering
• Optimized Settings (Ryzen 3600/RTX 2060 at 1080p)
  • high shadows
  • Ultra+ is very performance hungry, use high
  • high geo
  • original is good, high if you'd like
  • high AO
  • textures - depends on your vram, higher settings offer little improvement
    • Original for 6GB
    • anything higher for 8GB
  • Ultra anisotrophic filtering
• low end hardware (Ryzen 3600/GTX 1060/RX580)
  • very close to 60fps on a 1060
  • base PS4 can't hold a stable 30 in the same areas
  • 580 is very variable, can be close or very far below the 1060
  • 1080p/30 for 580 until fixes come
• mid range (2060 Super/5700, 1440p)
  • 2060S 17% faster
  • 5700 can hit below 60fps, frametime stutters, also on the 580
• cpu performance (Ryzen 3600/Core i9 10900K/RTX 3090, 540p)
  • internal cap at 160fps
  • 3600 is between 100-120fps in combat, can drop to close to 60fps in very short spikes
  • 10900K hits the cap most of the time, drops to 60fps in even less spikes
  • level loading causes gpu usage drops (still over 60fps), worse on lower end cpus than 10900K
    • at max settings, 4K DLSS Quality on 10900k/3090, loading areas can dip below 60fps
  • turn down shadows for better cpu performance
• resolution
  • has render scaling
  • use DLSS if you have and RTX card
    • 2060 at Original settings, 4K DLSS Performance hits 60fps nearly all the time
  • DLSS has artifacts with small elements like snow grains and far away foliage